Author: FKP

Hungary

Czech Republic

Slovakia

Ukraine

Poland

How many persons were invited?

How many p e r s o n s w e r e innterviewed

?

How many p e r s o n s refused in interview?

How many invitation are w i t h o u t reply?

10 persons were invited, 4 persons were interviewed, 3 persons refused, 3 invitations are without reply.

10 persons were invited,

3 p e r s o n s w e r e interviewed, 5 p e r s o n s refused, 2 invitations are without reply

8 persons were invited, 2 persons were interviewed, 3 persons refused, 3 invitations are without reply

11 persons were invited, 5 persons were interviewed, 4 persons refused and 2 invitation are without reply.

14 persons were invited, 6 persons were interviewed, 2 persons refused to take part in deep interview, 6 invitations are

without reply

Responsibilit y for energy security

Ministries and regulator were stressed by all respondents. Traders – 2 respondents TSO – 1

respondent

Government/ State

State and company EUSTREAM

and SPP

State bodies:

M i n i s t r y o f Energy and Coal Industry of Ukraine Institute of the President

M i n i s t r y o f F o r e i g n A f f a i r s o f U k r a i n e N a t i o n a l Security and D e f e n c e Council of Ukraine

State and business companies, especially PGNiG

M i n i s t r y o f E c o n o m i c Development of Ukraine M i n i s t r y o f I n t e r n a l A f f a i r s N a t i o n a l Commission f o r S t a t e Regulation in the energy and utilities A n t i – M o n o p o l y Committee of Ukraine

The role of energy reports and analyses

Important – 3 respondents and non important – 1 respondent

What read: Winter outlook, Globsec, ACER, oficial reports

All respondents said we have enough reports. Some papers are more scientists but ought to be more practical

MoE SR

reads mostly official papers;

Whar read: Energy Hub Service, Monitoring from MFA, International media, EU analysis, ENTSOG-

winter outlook, Plan for infrastructure development

Mostly official documents

Q u a l i t y o f the analysis

– t h e y a r e g e n e r a l , statistical, not concentrated o n e n e r g y s e c u r i t y details.

Q u a l i t y o f f o r e i g n analytical materials on e n e r g y s e c u r i t y i s better than of Ukrainian ones.

The state institutions don’t take into a c c o u n t analytical r e p o r t s o f think tanks.

What read : E u r o p e a n Institutions, International E n e r g y A g e n c y , N a t i o n a l r e g u l a t o r s a n d operators, Foreign think tanks (Atlantic C o u n c i l , C e n t e r f o r Strategic and International S t u d i e s ( U S A ) ,

B r o o k i n g s

Institution, ( U S A ) ,

C a r n e g i e Institution for S c i e n c e (USA), Oxford Institute for Energy Study ( G B ) ,

Ukrainian think tanks.

Lacks:Methodology of research papers;

A lot about h i s t o r y o f problem but there isn’t any forecast

ü N o information about sources and statistics; Conclusions a r e v e r y g e n e r a l formulated; L a t e analytics; Local focus, l a c k o f a r e g i o n a l approach;

Long

research, more than 5 pages

What read : OSW, PISM,

Pulaski Policy P a p e r s , o f f i c i a l r a p o r t s . G l o b a l – B r u e g e l , BBC, Oxford U n i v e r c i t y p a p e r s . A m e r i c a n a n a l i t i c s – very seldom

Preference is

Communaca

Comminicatio

Czech Gas

Nice

Respondents

Weak

tion with

n with TT is

Assossiation

communicatio

have insifht

communicatio

other

very

is the key

n insight state

communicatio

n insight

stackholders

important.

organisation

Slovak gas

n on their

states

Resently

for G, B and

and oil

level, for

between G

established

CS

association

exmple,

and B from

platform

communicatio

(51 members)

insight

one side and

n

– platform for

governmental

CS from other

structural

bodies or

debate

energy

companies. It

is weak

communicatio

n on the level

G-CS or B-

CS

Necessity of

Inflationary –

All

We have

A platform is

We have

a new

2

respondents –

enough

supported by

enough

platform

respondents.

we have

platforms

a l l

opportunity

V4 energy

enough

(all); EU

respondents.

for regional

platfor just

platforms for

initiatives on

cooperation

established

communicatio

regional level

n and not

maybe good

need in new

(MoE SR)

one

Energy crisis

Flow

It should be

O n

V i s e g r a d

Visegrad+

communicati

management,

more wide

international

platform has

platform

on

data

platform for

level only as

to include

involving

transparency

communicatio

a c a s e o f

U k r a i n e

experts from

and

n:

„scenario“ in

( p o s s i b l e

other

improvement

Czech,

case of crisis

involvement

countries who

the

Slovakia,

of the Baltic

have a rich

communicatio

Austria

countries,

research

n G and CS.

platform or

R o m a n i a ,

expertise in

Preparation

Czech/

B u l g a r i a ,

the Eastern

should be

Poland/

E a P

Europe

everything.

Germany

countries).

energy policy.

Personel with

platform or +

It was

expertice

Benelux

mentioned

needed.

experts from

USA, Japane,

Germany,

Austria,

Australia.